From owner-cvs-all  Sun May  9 16:30: 8 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 59CFC14C16; Sun,  9 May 1999 16:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from peter@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id QAA44217;
	Sun, 9 May 1999 16:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <199905092330.QAA44217@freefall.freebsd.org>
From: Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 16:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa ipl_funcs.c src/sys/i386/include
         cpufunc.h
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

peter       1999/05/09 16:30:04 PDT

  Modified files:
    sys/i386/isa         ipl_funcs.c 
    sys/i386/include     cpufunc.h 
  Log:
  loadandclear() uses an atomic instruction (even on SMP, where it's an
  implicitly LOCK'ed instruction), so there shouldn't be any harm in making
  it volatile pointer compatable for one of the users of it.  It seems to
  generate the same code regardless.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.19      +3 -3      src/sys/i386/isa/ipl_funcs.c
  1.87      +2 -2      src/sys/i386/include/cpufunc.h


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message