From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 16 20:47:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B59D1065677 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 20:47:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sr@genyosha.net) Received: from ns.genyosha.net (ns.genyosha.net [216.103.76.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091D68FC12 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 20:47:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sr@genyosha.net) Received: from dragon.genyosha.net (dragon.genyosha.net [216.103.76.254]) by ns.genyosha.net (8.12.11.20060614/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4GKBsYu012620 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:11:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.genyosha.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.genyosha.net (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4GKBs0a082616 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:11:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sr@dragon.genyosha.net) Received: (from sr@localhost) by dragon.genyosha.net (8.14.1/8.14.2/Submit) id m4GKBsQY082615 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 16 May 2008 13:11:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sr) Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:11:54 -0700 From: Steve Rikli To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080516201154.GA82576@dragon.genyosha.net> References: <482DCBEA.3030107@foster.cc> <20080516143917.5246a733@bhuda.mired.org> <482DDA1E.2030208@foster.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <482DDA1E.2030208@foster.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: [Fwd: lwresd howto] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 20:47:56 -0000 On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:01:50PM -0700, Mark Foster wrote: > Mike Meyer wrote: > ... > I have no problem using dnsmasq if that is the best recommendation, in > fact I quite like it but am not fond of djbdns. > However lwresd *is* in the base install vs. dnsmasq which is a port, so > would like to use lwresd if possible (or something else in base like > cached). There is nothing I find in the man page, handbook or google > that says I shouldn't or can't use lwresd, only hints that I can, yet > with no clear working real-world examples. > > So I'm really hoping for two answers. > 1. Can lwresd be used (somehow) or not > 2. What are the viable/best alternatives to #1 for a caching-only stub > resolver (like nscd on linux) Wrt #2, I was able to compile & install nscd from FreeBSD src, but only on systems running fairly modern releases -- IIRC no older than 6.2 . cheers, sr.