Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 19:00:00 -0700 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Pete Delaney <pete@RockyMountain.rahul.net> Cc: jehamby@lightside.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, netbsd-ports@netbsd.org Subject: Re: Netscape 2.0beta1 - Port of HotJava to FreeBSD and NetBSD More Usefull? Message-ID: <199510120200.TAA00506@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 11 Oct 1995 18:53:23 PDT." <199510120153.AA29192@RockyMountain.rahul.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oh, I don't know use Netscape and do a net search on Java and Linux
I am sure that you will find something.
Not sure if the linux stuff would be that useful and the last
time I looked around Java was still a mess.
if we have started doing something similar to java but with guild we
would have been done. The argument back then against guild was about the
huge number of Java applets, the GNU license and the lack of "features".
Go figure,
Amancio
>>> Pete Delaney said:
> > >>> Jake Hamby said:
> >
> > >
> > > I heard there was some fairly good progress being made on a Linux po
rt.
> > > Is this true? Because if the Linux people have a working version, t
hen a
> > > FreeBSD/NetBSD version would be almost trivial from there.
> > >
> >
> > Thats right people are still porting Java 8)
>
> Is it possible to get a snapshot of that effort to get more familiar
> with the problems. I tried starting from the Sun release but the mailfile
> problems looked like a lot of work. I would hope that by now the Sun makefil
e
> dependancies have been removed and the problems are more related to stuff li
ke
> the the thread libraries.
>
>
> -pete
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510120200.TAA00506>