Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 12:11:30 -0600 From: Scott Lambert <lambert@lambertfam.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's new on the 127.0.0/24 block in 7? Message-ID: <20080304181130.GA66467@sysmon.tcworks.net> In-Reply-To: <20080304032200.zydn8p7688ss00g0@webmail.1command.com> References: <200803040619.m246Jbja018523@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20080304000320.msp5bfrytc0wsowg@webmail.1command.com> <20080304095246.GA77655@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <20080304022321.kjxdx6oo0gkkwck8@webmail.1command.com> <20080304105448.GA84355@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <20080304032200.zydn8p7688ss00g0@webmail.1command.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 03:22:00AM -0800, Chris H. wrote: > No. It's not a matter of "holding back". I really don't want to spam > the stable list with ports litter. My main concern/question was in > figuring out why 2 identical server configs would react so differently > in the way they handle lo0 and friends - rbldnsd, or no rbldnsd. Have you recently diffed the actual running config files? From the sidelines, it sounds like a change may have been made and forgotten, or made by another admin which could be causing issues. I know that often when I start thinking, "Nothing is different the software is broken!" something is different. Important files off the top of my head: /etc/defaults/rc.conf /etc/rc.conf /etc/rc.local /etc/namedb/named.conf (and friends) /usr/local/etc/whatever_rbldnsd_uses pkg_info | egrep '(rbldns|named)' and then diff that output. maybe diff the "ifconfig -a" output between the two boxes and verify the expected differences. I think more details might actually translate to less clutter on the -stable list, even if it turns out to be ports related. -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin lambert@lambertfam.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080304181130.GA66467>