From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Apr 10 11:00:31 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA26056
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 11:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA26048
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 11:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA01479; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 10:59:23 -0700
Message-Id: <199604101759.KAA01479@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: DOS Emulator now available for porting to FreeBSD. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 10 Apr 1996 10:44:05 MDT."
             <199604101644.KAA01580@rocky.sri.MT.net> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 10:59:23 -0700
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

Also how well does the BSDI's DOS emulator work ?

	Cheers,
	Amancio

>>> Nate Williams said:
 > > Now since you have a different dos emulator, what would be involved
 > > to port it to linux?
 > 
 > Hold on now.  Linux already has a DOS emulator, so why would they want
 > another one.
 > 
 > Also, why are you asking the FreeBSD mailing list what would be involved
 > in porting a BSD emulator to Linux?  We've got to figure out how much
 > work it would be to port to FreeBSD first.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > Nate
 >