From owner-freebsd-chat Wed May 20 17:37:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA04322 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Wed, 20 May 1998 17:37:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [139.130.136.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA04312 for ; Wed, 20 May 1998 17:37:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id KAA25319; Thu, 21 May 1998 10:05:06 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from grog) Message-ID: <19980521100506.F22701@freebie.lemis.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 10:05:06 +0930 From: Greg Lehey To: Ross Harvey , avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au, peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au Cc: FreeBSD Chat Subject: Re: StrongARM and history References: <199805201724.KAA16750@random.teraflop.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199805201724.KAA16750@random.teraflop.com>; from Ross Harvey on Wed, May 20, 1998 at 10:24:21AM -0700 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org (following up to -chat, where it belongs) On Wed, 20 May 1998 at 10:24:21 -0700, Ross Harvey wrote: >> From: Darren Reed >> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 22:16:34 +1000 (EST) >> >> In some mail from Peter Jeremy, sie said: >>> >>> On Mon, 18 May 1998 13:15:03 -0700 (PDT), Julian Elischer wrote: >>>> do we have a strong-arm version of FreeBSD coming up? :-) >>> I suspect you'll find a NetBSD version. (There was a talk at AUUG'97 >>> on DEC's NC `DNARD', based on a SA-110. >> >> Sigh. >> >> Word has it that DEC sold out to Microsoft and scrapped the project. > > Yes, NetBSD supports the arm32 and the DNARD (there are at least a thousand > around here and there) in particular. > > I heard that rumor too, that M$ said: "So, if you want Windoze NoThanks to > keep running on the alpha, cancel that NC project". > > But, I don't totally believe it. They may have even said it, but I bet > Compaq would have pulled the plug anyway: I mean, the whole point of the > NC is to make an alternative to the corporate PC avalanche...why would > Compaq fund such a thing now that they have the keys? Of course, the > cancellation did seem a little early to be a Compaq move. Who knows? Your prejudice against Compaq seems ill-founded. They didn't buy up Tandem and DEC just to kill their operations. I do a lot of work for Tandem, and I'm very impressed about how Compaq have focussed the UNIX operation and got it moving ahead. To turn the question around, why would Compaq not fund such a thing now that they have the keys? Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message