Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:39:11 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> To: marco.broeder@gmx.eu Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: License Framework: Develop Best Practices Message-ID: <AANLkTikddG7UR8bpt4uIEL3ydCmHdA6dJYrNzknP3OOM@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201006152229.56351.marco.broeder@gmx.eu> References: <201006150247.20325.marco.broeder@gmx.eu> <6335CF3A-9845-48A6-B7E7-AB8252C123B1@mac.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1006150613290.22303@tiktik.epipe.com> <201006152229.56351.marco.broeder@gmx.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Marco Br=F6der <marco.broeder@gmx.eu> wrot= e: > On Tue June 15 2010 09:10:49 Janne Snabb wrote: >> As a previous poster pointed out, I also think that the different >> BSD licences should be separated. > > Yes, they really are different licenses. The BSD license has evolved over time. Compare the 4-clause license to the 3-clause license and the 2-clause license. > Who else should it know better than the FreeBSD Project (and NetBSD, Open= BSD, > DragonflyBSD, ...)? ;-) -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikddG7UR8bpt4uIEL3ydCmHdA6dJYrNzknP3OOM>