From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 01:59:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2FB106568A for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 01:59:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF508FC15 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 01:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m471nTZJ079143; Tue, 6 May 2008 21:49:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m471nToM073813 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 May 2008 21:49:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200805070149.m471nToM073813@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 21:48:18 -0400 To: Michael Proto , freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <4820FE0F.9050808@jellydonut.org> References: <4820FE0F.9050808@jellydonut.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: bsnmpd hrProcessorLoad results incorrect on FreeBSD 7 or 8? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 01:59:48 -0000 At 08:55 PM 5/6/2008, Michael Proto wrote: >Is anyone seeing problems with bsnmpd reporting an incorrect >HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad value under HEAD? I'm using the >default /etc/snmpd.config settings and am loading the >/usr/lib/snmp_hostres.so library just as I do in 6.3, but the value for >this MIB always reports CPU utilization at 100% regardless of the actual >load on the system. 6.3 and 6-STABLE both work correctly and report the >actual CPU utilization when queried. IIRC, I noticed this when I changed to ULE from 4BSD_SCHED. ---Mike