From owner-freebsd-security Fri Jun 1 2:38:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from alpha.netvision.net.il (alpha.netvision.net.il [194.90.1.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991DD37B422 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 02:38:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lirandb@netvision.net.il) Received: from a ([213.57.143.184]) by alpha.netvision.net.il (8.9.3/8.8.6) with SMTP id MAA11802 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:38:12 +0300 (IDT) Message-ID: <00f101c0ea86$76af6fa0$b88f39d5@a> From: "Liran Dahan" To: Subject: Re: Apache Software Foundation Server Compromised, Resecured Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:34:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00EE_01C0EA97.3A05E500" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00EE_01C0EA97.3A05E500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Would it be much much better to use as well as all the ssh security = issues, an IPFW Rules for it? or maybe TCP_Wrappers as well ?=20 -Liran Dahan- (lirandb@netvision.net.il) ------=_NextPart_000_00EE_01C0EA97.3A05E500 Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Would it be much much better to use as = well as all=20 the ssh security issues, an IPFW Rules for it? or maybe TCP_Wrappers as = well ?=20
 
-Liran Dahan- (lirandb@netvision.net.il)
------=_NextPart_000_00EE_01C0EA97.3A05E500-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message