From owner-freebsd-cluster Tue Aug 22 12: 5:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from garm.bart.nl (garm.bart.nl [194.158.170.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BA637B43C for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 12:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from daemon.ninth-circle.org (root@daemon.ninth-circle.org [195.38.210.81]) by garm.bart.nl (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e7MJ5cG45582; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 21:05:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by daemon.ninth-circle.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA66882; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 20:58:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 20:58:21 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: Ronald G Minnich Cc: "freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Is this list active? Message-ID: <20000822205820.K14958@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <20000818104056.A84928@lucifer.bart.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from rminnich@lanl.gov on Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 08:25:37AM -0600 Organisation: Ninth-Circle Enterprises Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20000818 18:01], Ronald G Minnich (rminnich@lanl.gov) wrote: >On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > >> Just a curious question, I guess a keep alive type of system where a >> daemon per host sends out and acks keep alive messages is the easiest >> form of high availability, right? > >not so clear that it is useful, but it will work. We need to start somewhere. ;) And a keep-alive type of signaller daemon is the easiest to program and thus a good starting point. At least for me. -- Jeroen Ruigrok vd Werven/Asmodai asmodai@[wxs.nl|bart.nl|freebsd.org] Documentation nutter/C-rated Coder BSD: Technical excellence at its best The BSD Programmer's Documentation Project Abandon hope, all ye who enter here... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message