From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 31 11:31:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7491065672; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC6E8FC15; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F54C46B03; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:31:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.hudson-trading.com (unknown [209.249.190.8]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B4F1F8A043; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:31:52 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:31:23 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <3bbf2fe10908281904l6f8119a5l2daa301016eac8ef@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe10908281904l6f8119a5l2daa301016eac8ef@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908310731.24021.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:31:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: Attilio Rao , Konstantin Belousov Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS KPI/API versioning X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:31:53 -0000 On Friday 28 August 2009 10:04:55 pm Attilio Rao wrote: > Often I found as it would have been useful to verify, mostly at > run-time, of a feature of the VFS was supported and I quickly thought > that having a run-time check for VFS versioning would not be a bad > idea. > In order to do that, I made the following patch: > http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/vfs_modload.diff You don't have to have an actual DECLARE_MODULE() to use MODULE_VERSION(). Given that, you can simplify this patch down to a single line that just adds the MODULE_VERSION(). -- John Baldwin