From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 22 21:12:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19652D24 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA491575 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6C9998D; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 32C874896; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 22:12:09 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Chris Nehren Subject: Re: ntpd vulnerabilities References: <252350272.1812596.1419241828431.JavaMail.zimbra@cleverbridge.com> <201412221745.KAA28186@mail.lariat.net> <20141222185238.GA3308@behemoth.lan> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 22:12:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20141222185238.GA3308@behemoth.lan> (Chris Nehren's message of "Mon, 22 Dec 2014 13:52:38 -0500") Message-ID: <861tnrz8wm.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:12:23 -0000 Chris Nehren writes: > Brett Glass writes: > > I'd like to propose that FreeBSD move to OpenNTPD, which appears to > > have none of the [...] vulnerabilities that are present in ntpd. > [...] I am reticent to support more software going into the base > system. It should be small enough to build itself and bootstrap the > ports tree, with very little else. I absolutely agree. If we replace the NTP suite, it will be with a minimal SNTP client, although no decision has been made. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no