From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Aug 7 3:31:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.musha.org (daemon.musha.org [61.122.44.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC15137B401; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 03:31:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from knu@iDaemons.org) Received: from archon.local.idaemons.org (archon.local.idaemons.org [192.168.1.32]) by mail.musha.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE244E24E; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 19:31:13 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 19:31:12 +0900 Message-ID: <867kwgjh5b.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> From: "Akinori MUSHA" To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, nakai@FreeBSD.ORG, dr@domix.de, demon@FreeBSD.ORG, gnome@FreeBSD.ORG, mi@aldan.algebra.com, ijliao@FreeBSD.ORG, andreas@FreeBSD.ORG, roman@xpert.com, greg@hewgill.com, jedgar@FreeBSD.ORG, jmz@FreeBSD.ORG, samy@goldmoon.org, dirk@FreeBSD.ORG, kanou@mil.allnet.ne.jp Subject: Re: Introducing USE_BZIP2{CMD,LIB,RUN} and BZIP2BASE In-Reply-To: <200108071003.f77A3nF64150@vega.vega.com> References: <200108071003.f77A3nF64150@vega.vega.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.7.1 (Too Funky) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) Organization: Associated I. Daemons X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 081D 099C 1705 861D 4B70 B04A 920B EFC7 9FD9 E1EE MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:03:09 +0300 (EEST), sobomax wrote: > I do not see any problems with retiring bzip2 port in my variant - > when the time has came just remove archivers/bzip2 and its traces > in RUN/LIB/BUILD_DEPENDS of various ports. The former is common > for both scenarios, while you have to do the latter at the beginning > of your scenario anyway (i.e. convert RUN/LIB/BUILD_DEPENDS into > various USE_*). 1. It's still uglier. We don't need such kind of kludgy symlinks. Introducing BZIP2BASE is cleaner and matches the reality. 2. USE_BZIP2 implies EXTRACT_SUFX=.tar.bz2 and EXTRACT_CMD=bzip2 but which are sometimes unwanted. Introducing USE_BZIP2CMD will solve this cleanly. 3. It'd be better to be consistent with what we are doing for OpenSSL. 4. You didn't object but agreed when we changed bsd.port.mk not to depend on archivers/bzip2 if the system has /usr/bin/bzip2. -- / /__ __ Akinori.org / MUSHA.org / ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp "Freeze this moment a little bit longer, make each impression a little bit stronger.. Experience slips away -- Time stand still" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message