From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 21 20:00:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE36B1065676 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 20:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao107.cox.net (eastrmmtao107.cox.net [68.230.240.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6660C8FC14 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 20:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080521200048.JRYF14275.eastrmmtao107.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>; Wed, 21 May 2008 16:00:48 -0400 Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id UL0o1Z00J4iy4EG02L0pDY; Wed, 21 May 2008 16:00:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:03:00 -0500 To: "Alexey Shuvaev" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080521165659.GA8375@wep4017.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20080521165659.GA8375@wep4017.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.27 (Linux) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome reference framework bsd.gnome-reference.mk VS [NO]PORTDOCS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 20:00:50 -0000 On Wed, 21 May 2008 11:56:59 -0500, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > Hello list! > > I am working on update to x11-toolkits/gtkdatabox2 and it has recently > got > an html reference (built using gtk-doc). The gtkdatabox2 is a rather > rarely used port and its reference consists of app. 25 files (for now). > What is better, > - to create separate gtkdatabox-reference port, or > - to intstall documentation from the existing port, under the > control of NOPORTDOCS variable? It's up to you. If it was my port, I would have chosen #2 option since it's very small and I dislike reference framework. If it's big then I possible would choice #1. > The second question is about bsd.gnome-reference.mk framework discussed > recently[1]. Althoug gtkdatabox is not an official part of gnome, > it uses the same structure and therefore could be handled in the same way > as other "official" gnome components. Are there any reasons to use one > of: > - devel/glib20-reference/bsd.gnome-reference.mk framework > - handling docs on one's own? It doesn't has to be only for GNOME. We have glib*-reference, cairo-reference and others that aren't part of GNOME. Cheers, Mezz > Thanks, > Alexey. > > 1. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-May/048645.html > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2008-May/048647.html -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org