Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 13:52:14 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Isabell Long <issyl0@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "svn-doc-head@FreeBSD.org" <svn-doc-head@FreeBSD.org>, "svn-doc-all@FreeBSD.org" <svn-doc-all@FreeBSD.org>, Gavin Atkinson <gavin@FreeBSD.org>, "doc-committers@FreeBSD.org" <doc-committers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r38908 - head/share/sgml Message-ID: <4FC6887E.6070903@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120530154513.GA1796@sky.issyl0.co.uk> References: <201205271335.q4RDZgtk051773@svn.freebsd.org> <4FC29C2B.70405@FreeBSD.org> <1338382465.65409.63.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <20120530154513.GA1796@sky.issyl0.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/30/2012 8:45 AM, Isabell Long wrote: > On 30 May 2012, at 13:54, Gavin Atkinson <gavin@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 14:27 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >>> On 05/27/2012 06:35, Gavin Atkinson wrote: >>>> + <description>The Bangladeshi FreeBSD User Group is a group of the FreeBSD >>> >>> Would &os; be appropriate here as well? >> >> Now I've already made the commit though, I'm not sure it is worth >> touching that line again (especially when the rest of the file uses >> almost none of our entities). > > Why not completely fix it? Surely there's no point leaving the whole > file imperfect and having the same discussion in six months time when > others notice? > > (I realise that I may have just volunteered myself for the task...) Since Isabell already volunteered I feel safe in saying that my preference is towards repo-churn that leads to a more complete solution as well. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC6887E.6070903>