From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 20 20:17:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8873E106564A; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:17:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uqs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:23c2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F568FC14; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:17:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:23c2::1]) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0KKHeYZ063350 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:17:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uqs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:17:40 +0100 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= To: current@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20110120201740.GE24444@acme.spoerlein.net> Mail-Followup-To: current@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: RFC vgrind in base (and buildworld) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: current@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:17:42 -0000 Hello, Currently our buildworld relies on groff(1) and vgrind(1) being present in the host system. I have a patch ready that at least makes sure these are built during bootstrap-tools and completes the WITHOUT_GROFF flag. vgrind(1) is only used for two papers under share/doc and we could easily expand the results and commit them to svn directly, alleviating the need to run vgrind(1) during buildworld. OTOH, there are much more useful tools to vgrind(1) for source code formatting. So do we still have vgrind(1) users out there? Regards, Uli