From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 18 18:51:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ptd.net (srv1.ptd.net [204.186.0.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5ECD914CA0 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 18:51:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nickf@ptd.net) Received: (qmail 16579 invoked from network); 19 Mar 1999 02:51:08 -0000 Received: from cs5-1.pot.ptd.net (HELO ranger.nick.net) (204.186.34.65) by mail.ptd.net with SMTP; 19 Mar 1999 02:51:08 -0000 Received: by ranger.nick.net with Microsoft Mail id <01BE7189.C32FCAA0@ranger.nick.net>; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 21:53:31 -0500 Message-ID: <01BE7189.C32FCAA0@ranger.nick.net> From: Nick Folino To: "'me@T-F-I.freeserve.co.uk'" , "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: RE: Confusion Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 21:53:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I suggest that future CDRom releases from the current branch be labeled Un-Stable. I know this sounds weird at first, but it would put any newcomer off buying something unsuitable for first time use. Everyone in the know of course would buy it regardless. That would not make too much sense IMHO. Even current snaps of fbsd are more stable than anything I've seen out of Redmond. Nick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message