From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 26 19:50:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1553937B40B for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 19:50:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF5043F75 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 19:50:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4R2oBUp057894 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 19:50:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4R2oBpt057893; Mon, 26 May 2003 19:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 19:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200305270250.h4R2oBpt057893@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Cyrille Lefevre Subject: Re: ports/51759: Maintainer update: astro/setiathome (manual page fix, etc.) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Cyrille Lefevre List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 02:50:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/51759; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Cyrille Lefevre To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/51759: Maintainer update: astro/setiathome (manual page fix, etc.) Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 04:48:53 +0200 On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 07:00:42PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Cyrille! > > Your changes to the setiathome.sh startup-script now lead to shell > errors on startup -- missing quote. I added the quote, and hit another > error. I'll be sending you my update -- including the upgrade to 3.08 > for FreeBSD in a separate e-mail. Please, take a look. that part has been completly rewritten using an external wrapper... > As far as the new start-up script, I'm not sure it is worth the extra > shells (per CPU) to run to automaticly restart setiathome if it exits. ditto. > Even if you are convinced, such auto-restarting is desirable (I'm not), > it should be one sleeping shell per machine -- not one per CPU, don't > you think? My dual CPU box has four setiathome-owned processes runing > instead of 3. Someone's 8-way monster will have 16 instead of 9 :-) done. > Finally, with the amount of shell scripting required for this, may be, > it would be easier to write the seti-helper in C? too complicated... everything was done using our stock sh :) see you. Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net