From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 21:36:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D63106564A; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:36:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856CB8FC15; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p7ULarI0038096; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:36:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id p7ULar5D038095; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:36:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:36:53 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: "Hartmann, O." Message-ID: <20110830213653.GA37937@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <1314733660.22981.YahooMailClassic@web113503.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E5D5489.4070408@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E5D5489.4070408@zedat.fu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" , giffunip@tutopia.com, "b. f." , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PHORONIX: OpenCL, GLSL Back-End For LLVM May Soon Open Up X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:36:53 -0000 On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:22:17PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > On 08/30/11 21:47, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > > > >Christopher Bergstr?m and Pathscale delivered the EKOPath > >Compiler Suite, but no one followed up: > > > >(From the WantedPorts Wiki) > >https://github.com/pathscale/path64-suite > > > >There has been very low interest in the FreeBSD port, > >and unfortunately this is a bad signal that we give to > >companies that want to contribute :(. > > > >Pedro. I've tested pathf90 on FreeBSD 9.0. Once I got it built, I was underwhelmed by its performance. I also found that it could not read its own error message catalogues, which of course make an unpleasant programming experience. -- Steve