From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 21 10:59:48 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 10CAC37B401; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.westbend.net (ns1.westbend.net [216.47.253.3])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 474EC43FDD; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from hetzels@westbend.net)
Received: from ADMIN00 (WBIw005.westbend.net [216.47.253.25])
	by mail.westbend.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3LHxgJJ087448;
	Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:59:46 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from hetzels@westbend.net)
Message-ID: <001801c3082f$cbffa600$19fd2fd8@westbend.net>
From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <hetzels@westbend.net>
To: "Doug Barton" <DougB@freebsd.org>
References: <200304200055.h3K0tHJB005595@WBIw009.westbend.net>
	<20030420140251.W631@znfgre.tberna.bet>
	<001301c30816$f55e5a50$13fd2fd8@Admin02>
	<20030421093940.L2827@znfgre.tberna.bet>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:59:43 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
cc: FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Enhancements to the new rc.d/jail script
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:59:48 -0000

From: "Doug Barton" <DougB@freebsd.org>
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Scot W. Hetzel wrote:
>
> > If a sys admin defines ruleset 10 in /etc/rc.devfs, then either the 2
will
> > be merged or the rc.d/devfs ruleset will be overwritten (if "/sbin/devfs
> > rule -s 10 delset" is in /etc/rc.devfs).
>
> Thanks for the clarification. I think that this has enough foot-shooting
> potential that it should probably be hidden behind a knob in rc.conf.
>

What do you think of the following changes?

/etc/defaults/rc.conf
    :
    devfs_jail_ruleset_enable    # Enable Standard Jail ruleset
    devfs_jail_ruleset_num='666'  # Standard Jail ruleset number (change if
it conflicts with your rulesets)
                                              # Also change
jail_default_ruleset to match.
    :
    jail_default_ruleset='666'    # Default ruleset to apply to a jail if
devfs enabled and no ruleset specified.
    :

/etc/rc.d/devfs
    :
    # Standard Jail ruleset
    if checkyesno devfs_jail_ruleset_enable ; then
        /sbin/devfs -s ${devfs_jail_ruleset_num} delset
        :
        :
    fi
    :

We could also enable the Standard Jail ruleset when jail_enable is set.

Scot