From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb  1 02:35:22 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F6316A420;
	Wed,  1 Feb 2006 02:35:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E134943D45;
	Wed,  1 Feb 2006 02:35:21 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AC61A3C20;
	Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:35:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 29EDD51BFD; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:35:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:35:21 -0500
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
Message-ID: <20060201023521.GA20497@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0601312122360.4643-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
	<ED92AAA4-F610-4DC1-A8C5-FDF646D083AF@mcneil.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ED92AAA4-F610-4DC1-A8C5-FDF646D083AF@mcneil.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>,
	current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MFC of bump in libcom_err.so another mistake?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:35:22 -0000


--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 06:28:14PM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote:
>=20
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>=20
> >On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Sean McNeil wrote:
> >>
> >>The point I am making is that this is in the -STABLE tree, not the -
> >>CURRENT tree.  There is no bump of libc and I don't see any reason
> >>for the libcom_err.so revision bump in -STABLE.  IMHO, it didn't make
> >>sense.
> >
> >I don't think it was -stable at the time.  It was probably
> >6.0-current and the version bump occurred just before the
> >release.  As a -current user, you are expected to be able
> >to deal with this and rebuild all your ports if necessary.
>=20
>=20
> This is EXACTLY what I am saying.  I am not a -current user, I am a -=20
> stable user and this happened about a week ago or so.  It was =20
> libcom_err.so.2.1 until just recently.

The confusion seems to be that you sent your email to the wrong
mailing list.

Kris

--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFD4B5oWry0BWjoQKURAgHwAJ9XR8U6N760ZSued+9ChJVXsn/UGQCbBUeX
U18ET9j+kEicshcYzO1qH78=
=K1PB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd--