Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 02:50:27 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org> To: jonathan michaels <jlm@caamora.com.au> Cc: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Website accessability issues (was Re: new FreeBSD-webpage) Message-ID: <p06200702bf6e1601123d@[10.0.1.210]> In-Reply-To: <20051009095117.18246@caamora.com.au> References: <di2s9q$4ss$1@sea.gmane.org> <43455D3E.5040007@mbnet.fi> <20051006204336.GA36557@neptune.atopia.net> <20051006213326.GA33286@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051006213740.GA37835@neptune.atopia.net> <20051006214904.GB33546@xor.obsecurity.org> <nospam-1128661925.48923@iliad.gbch.net> <20051008110225.52611@caamora.com.au> <p06200742bf6d42f3aed3@[172.16.1.3]> <20051008181333.GF6076@freebsdmall.com> <20051009095117.18246@caamora.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 9:51 AM +1000 2005-10-09, jonathan michaels wrote:
> as
> to why i and those like me do not use the available spelling checkers,
> simple they are american based algorithms with dictionaries that spell
> most of teh simple words that we use incoreectly and the superposition
> of z for s is most silly as far as we are concerntde, it is most
> difficult to understand and hence to use correctly and makes using teh
> freebsd (and all american sourced/developed/uiltb) websites awkward to
> say teh least.
Spelling flames are never appropriate. That said, there are good
spell checking (and grammar checking) programs that use (or can use)
alternative dictionaries/rulesets, so this is not really a good
excuse for not using them.
As a result, I don't think that this is a good topic to bring
into this discussion, which has been focussed on the matter of
usability issues of the "new look" FreeBSD website.
I will remove freebsd-stable from the set of recipients for this
response, because I think this is pretty off-topic for that list.
However, I must say that fixed page width is a bad idea. It
causes people to scroll too much horizontally and vertically, if they
have a smaller screen available to them than you've designed for
(among other things, think mobile computing where many browsers may
be 320 pixels wide, at best). And it doesn't make good use of the
screen real estate available if your screen is larger than the page
was designed for.
If you can't achieve something you want with a variable page
width, then I think you should change your goals rather than to force
people to live with bad page design.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/>; for more info.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06200702bf6e1601123d>