From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 19:18:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E70106567B for ; Mon, 5 May 2008 19:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960138FC13; Mon, 5 May 2008 19:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <481F5D79.4030203@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 21:18:17 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Carl Shapiro References: <4dcb5abd0805050540m292b319aw52aa2cb8ba018e12@mail.gmail.com> <481F0DB3.9070505@FreeBSD.org> <481F48EE.3050806@elischer.org> <481F4EED.2030300@FreeBSD.org> <4dcb5abd0805051132o77d68e36u3f0ad38630a02afd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4dcb5abd0805051132o77d68e36u3f0ad38630a02afd@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Julian Elischer Subject: Re: binary compatibility query X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 19:18:19 -0000 Carl Shapiro wrote: > If my binary only executes system calls indirectly through libc > interfaces, as far as libc and libm are concerned, are new symbols the > only thing I need to worry about? I think so, yes. Kris