From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Jun 5 12:30: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1553837B403 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:30:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f55JU3O26476; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:30:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200106051930.f55JU3O26476@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Will Andrews Subject: Re: bin/27887: ipfw 'backup' option proposal Reply-To: Will Andrews Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/27887; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews To: Bill Fumerola Cc: FreeBSD GNATS DB Subject: Re: bin/27887: ipfw 'backup' option proposal Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:21:38 -0500 On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 12:30:02AM -0700, Bill Fumerola (billf@mu.org) wrote: > potential committers: don't commit this. I have a much more generic (atomic > changing of rulesets, recursive inclusing of rulesets) implementation that I > might finish one of these days... > > in any case, doing this in ipfw(8) doesn't even seem like the right place > to pull this off.. Why don't you post what you've got so the submitter and others can pitch in? It doesn't have to be a one-man effort. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message