From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 19 16:11:23 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1171A89A
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:11:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from the-host.seacom.mu (ge-0.ln-01-mba.ke.seacomnet.com
 [41.87.100.230])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A01C4173C
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:11:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=the-host.localnet)
 by the-host.seacom.mu with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1)
 (envelope-from <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>)
 id 1WG9jg-0005U6-A6; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:11:00 +0200
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Organization: SEACOM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Reverse DNS question
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:10:51 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-24-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; i686; ; )
References: <20140218180620.0807880cf0dd661482e394b9@3dresearch.com>
 <5304930A.6080004@bluerosetech.com> <53049D62.8030903@qeng-ho.org>
In-Reply-To: <53049D62.8030903@qeng-ho.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart21767476.emWkQkalsl";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201402191810.51521.mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Cc: Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org>,
 Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:11:23 -0000

--nextPart21767476.emWkQkalsl
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 02:02:42 PM Arthur Chance=20
wrote:

> Thank you. That was the sort of information I was after.
> So we will have to tell our MTAs to use specific
> addresses as opposed to wildcard binding.

Whatever you did in IPv4, you do in IPv6. Just with=20
different numbers.

As the saying goes, "96 more bits, no magic".

Mark.

--nextPart21767476.emWkQkalsl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAABAgAGBQJTBNeLAAoJEGcZuYTeKm+GhO8P/0+IQ4vt2c+80uWOwGs6xklk
1W30e9yEYZymCcbfRDNeFVu+eR3WGq92RkJLbgtUta5GwBkeVZV/+VCp/xF/x/FK
zUX72I73497ZNxK6kHom1nXN8iPZN0SRBB8qKgt/fMYX7TlbEwpBcWdbU1p1GDZ2
CCP67w3hrZFUEkL43AvhWGiSOzoTAA6z7CFP83WnYDi9b963DwqVcsfE/X7XePds
TXcVyZRnj5jYV5wuFTYRok5ldzDb6+1tx/TrTgvWnEphljK95fzu2E8PXH8Tt6zD
6NpfmVN24yPX1sPvENRJqLstIUvAVfN6dht782F9M1miU/hNClTeectMzhwlKtQs
NTAZCwb3+mczMkwBa4X3AaFqd6G6sE7wmFcBewjnvfAJEkh3/v9QiDk9B1h+7VoR
Bjt3psM5d9DLLVirTadwZlBBSwXgELqvhTY2tcS0h4vl75B38drACDFQf7ylRsiU
iA9gn2xQ9/TGe53dIWMxDJKgk4E/1TTp8OX8aFJIPAv3fv2y7bmUktkxkoOX9u09
3ETlGjnWCeCe7F14NwMKqcZSUdajggz4V396ACk3RamcMO+t+QI0DqrLFRYKE/jQ
3ronuO2BtmN+iMC3AxuSJ2f2xO1PuthypfOJOGJTBPPwofP96a6YCcM6ESOA7H0r
ao86wkdG9gTTXwZCNBWh
=t+f/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart21767476.emWkQkalsl--