From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Jul 22 22:17:52 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.9])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1F638156B2; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 22:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA07691;
	Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:16:02 +1000
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:16:02 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199907230516.PAA07691@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, green@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Still kernel compilation failures
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, schuerge@wjpserver.CS.Uni-SB.DE
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>> It is supported, but someone broke it.
>
>Since when? Every so often someone comes along (from a pool of maybe 5
>people who _don't_ use -O) and complains about it being broken. If

My last fix for a -O related bug was on 1999/05/13 for brooktree.c
(memcmp() was used, but memcmp() doesn't exist in the kernel unless
the kernel is compiled with -O and without -fno-builtin).  I didn't
check that -O actually worked :-).

>So I was right (in my way that totally denies any type of actual understanding
>;)?  You're the one to have delved deep into GCC :)

I just read the buggy code.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message