From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 9 12:32:45 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA02859 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 12:32:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from heathers.stdio.com (heathers.stdio.com [199.89.192.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA02842 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 12:32:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lile@stdio.com) Received: from heathers.stdio.com (lile@heathers.stdio.com [199.89.192.5]) by heathers.stdio.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA01035; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 15:23:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lile@stdio.com) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 15:23:26 -0500 (EST) From: Larry Lile To: Julian Elischer cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: NFS Alignment? was (Re: Why did this panic?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG By the way, is the "m->m_data += 2;" still a neccesary evil to apease NFS? I have always seen it in drivers but I never understood why it was there or if I really needed to follow it. from if_ed.c: 2727-2732 /* * The +2 is to longword align the start of the real packet. * This is important for NFS. */ m->m_data += 2; eh = mtod(m, struct ether_header *); Larry Lile lile@stdio.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message