From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed May 29 09:01:03 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA13088 for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 29 May 1996 09:01:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xi.dorm.umd.edu (root@sl-002.sl.cybercomm.net [199.171.196.130]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA13081 for ; Wed, 29 May 1996 09:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (smpatel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xi.dorm.umd.edu (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA02854 for ; Wed, 29 May 1996 12:00:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 12:00:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Sujal Patel X-Sender: smpatel@xi.dorm.umd.edu To: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386/631 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 28 May 1996, Lars Fredriksen wrote: > > > Nobody appears to know how to put this card into promiscuous mode, nor > > > how to configure its multicast filters. I tried to argued that bpf is > > > useful without promiscuous mode, but was overruled. > > > > > Can we close it then? Its been there for almost a year now... > > if someone *really* misses it, they can always submit a new PR...? I could have sworn there was a "Bug State" called "Held" for PR's that couldn't be solved immediately for one reason or another, and for when the fix wasn't feasible at the current time. Was I hallucinating or something? Sujal