Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 00:07:25 -0500 From: "Andrew C. Hornback" <achornback@worldnet.att.net> To: <advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Java development platform comparison (was: RE: Microsoft Advocacy?) Message-ID: <002801c18aa6$8bcc22a0$6600000a@ach.domain> In-Reply-To: <035501c189de$e7f458e0$0a00000a@atkielski.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Anthony > Atkielski > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:18 AM > To: Gilbert Gong; Warren Smith; advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: Microsoft Advocacy? > > Gilbert writes: > > > Linux has much better java support, which > > is actually a "killer app" for many companies. > > Somehow, it seems eerily logical that a company enamored of Java > would also > spring for Linux. They were probably made for each other. If they wanted to do it right, as many would say, they'd have gone with Solaris. Which leads me to ask, what are the differences in developing Java on a FreeBSD platform and that of other platforms (Linux and Solaris, exclude Microsoft from this discussion)? (And yes, I'm fully aware that Microsoft no longer produces a Java product as they had their ass sued off by Sun and had to sell their botched J++ product to Rational Software). Why is Linux a better platform for Java development than FreeBSD? --- Andy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002801c18aa6$8bcc22a0$6600000a>