From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 16 15:27:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EE4106564A for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay01.kiev.sovam.com (relay01.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7BF8FC16 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.226] (helo=skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua) by relay01.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JauIv-000EYH-Gh; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:57:42 +0200 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2GEiIjG019051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:44:18 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2GEi5uU021805; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:44:05 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m2GEi5YV021803; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:44:05 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:44:04 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20080316144404.GP10374@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20080315080424.13561oymhrersh8g@intranet.encontacto.net> <62449124@ipt.ru> <20080315135046.50957aqphwntgv40@intranet.encontacto.net> <40994934@ipt.ru> <20080316095023.4a64aecd@deskjail> <20080316102336.GA44640@freebsd.org> <20080316140618.1532db62@deskjail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="waqf3ldl5CnEMrQn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080316140618.1532db62@deskjail> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91.2, clamav-milter version 0.91.2 on skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: 8d26fb09d298f8c1cb325fc86345eca8 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 2421 [Mar 14 2008] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0278], KAS30/Release Cc: freebsd-emulation Subject: Re: What is the recommended LinuxEmulator and kernel that will run skype-devel and maybe Flash9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:27:36 -0000 --waqf3ldl5CnEMrQn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 02:06:18PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Roman Divacky (Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:23:36 += 0100): >=20 > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 09:50:23AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > Quoting Boris Samorodov (Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:24:25 +030= 0): > > >=20 > > > > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:50:46 -0500 eculp wrote: > > >=20 > > > > > I had already set the kernel to 2.4.20 and though that there migh= t be > > > > > an advantage to go to f7 and a 2.6.?? kernel. UPDATING doesn't g= ive > > > > > me that info. If there is major advantage, like flash9, the new = skype > > > > > with video, etc. I will think about it it bit more. > > > >=20 > > > > Can't say anything about 2.4.20. Only 2.4.2 (the default one) and > > > > 2.6.16 (with is intended to become a default in the future) are > > > > tested. Use any other values at your risk. > > >=20 > > > 2.4.20 expects the NPTL in the kernel, but our kernel only activates > >=20 > > I seriously doubt that... NPTL is 2.6 stuff >=20 > Wasn't 2.4.20 the backport of the NPTL stuff from RedHat? Or do I mix I believe so. > this with futexes or something else? Futexes are prerequisites for the NPTL, at least so it seems for the casual observer. --waqf3ldl5CnEMrQn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkfdMjMACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4hTuwCdGLU/MyQ9Ov5+fsHSzLgo3MvE b+8An3DF31+1Yw/Rbg/Qh0QG75U9kNAO =tzEy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --waqf3ldl5CnEMrQn--