From owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 22 14:59:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6441216A4CE for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:59:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail3.speakeasy.net (mail3.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166FB43D3F for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:59:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 28901 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2003 22:59:43 -0000 Received: from dsl027-160-063.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) encrypted SMTP for ; 22 Dec 2003 22:59:43 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBMMxSM0047564; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:59:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20031222225139.GL652@submonkey.net> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:59:37 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Ceri Davies X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: FreeBSD bugmaster cc: "Simon L. Nielsen" cc: freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Quality Assurance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 22:59:52 -0000 On 22-Dec-2003 Ceri Davies wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:09:06PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: >> On 2003.12.22 16:46:32 -0500, John Baldwin wrote: >> > >> > On 22-Dec-2003 Simon L. Nielsen wrote: >> > > On 2003.12.22 14:36:31 -0500, John Baldwin wrote: >> > > >> > >> Why does qa get two e-mails with two different lists? >> > > >> > > I think it's because some PR's are assigned to 'qa' and others to >> > > 'freebsd-qa'. >> > >> > Oof. They all list 'qa' as the owner though. >> >> The freebsd- part is stripped from the owner column, but the To field of >> the emails still have the real owner address. >> >> All the PR's assigned to qa should probably be reassigned to freebsd-qa, >> since that seems to be the common form used other places... > > Trivially done, but it will result in 126 mails to the list unless I > lock gnats for a few minutes to do it manually and regenerate the index. > > Preferences? Whatever is easiest for you. Also, send a note to developers@ perhaps stating that freebsd-foo is preferred to foo. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/