Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 14:49:55 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [linux-f10] linux_socketcall... ERR#43 'Protocol not supported' Message-ID: <20090505144955.16373k1b32dpaxo0@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <81924694@bb.ipt.ru> References: <81924694@bb.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> (from Tue, 05 May 2009 09:51:21 +0400): > Hello List, > > > I'm working on Fedora 10 ports and almost all is fine (even > google-earth seems to work)... But there is no resolving. > I managed to find the culprit. Here it is: > Ktrace/linux_kdump gives this: > ----- > 48833 ping CALL linux_socketcall(0x1,0xbfbfd218) > 48833 ping RET linux_socketcall -1 errno 93 Unknown error: 93 > 48833 ping CALL gettimeofday(0xbfbfd2e0,0) > 48833 ping RET gettimeofday 0 > 48833 ping CALL linux_socketcall(0x1,0xbfbfd218) > 48833 ping RET linux_socketcall -1 errno 93 Unknown error: 93 > 48833 ping CALL write(0x2,0xbfbfbf48,0x1a) > 48833 ping GIO fd 2 wrote 26 bytes > "ping: unknown host www.ru > " > 48833 ping RET write 26/0x1a > 48833 ping CALL linux_exit_group(0x2) > ---- There was a commit after April 30 about linux socket stuff. I don't know if it is related or not. You can either update and test, or instrument the current code to print out the parameters to linux_socketcall in a human readable way. > If we manage to solve this, I'd say we are ready for f10. I suggest to add a COMMENT to some ports before... ;-) Bye, Alexander. -- A bird in the hand is worth what it will bring. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090505144955.16373k1b32dpaxo0>