From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 8 13:22:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B546F16A4CE; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:22:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A27243D55; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:22:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920) id 8D9565C9EB; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 05:22:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:22:28 +0100 From: Maxime Henrion To: Ulrich Sp?rlein Message-ID: <20050308132228.GD31320@elvis.mu.org> References: <200503021343.j22DhpQ3075008@repoman.freebsd.org> <200503020915.28512.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <4226446B.7020406@freebsd.org> <61ac46c154aa515a692308440dd1141d@FreeBSD.org> <422710DD.1070203@freebsd.org> <422719E0.10703@samsco.org> <20050307195156.GA18850@dragon.nuxi.com> <422CBDEE.7020307@samsco.org> <20050307211942.GA37106@ns1.xcllnt.net> <20050308131613.GA812@galgenberg.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050308131613.GA812@galgenberg.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:22:28 -0000 Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote: > > In other words: the gcc(1) manual is inaccurate. > > Sorry to hijack this thread, but could we get an up-to-date manual page > for gcc please? Pretty please? > > % gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 3.4.2 [FreeBSD] 20040728 > ^^^^^ > > % man gcc|head > GCC(1) GNU Tools GCC(1) > NAME > gcc, g++ - GNU project C and C++ Compiler (gcc-3.2.1) > ^^^^^^^^^ This version number in the gcc(1) manpage is really the least of the problems... The GCC guys don't maintain the manpage anymore, as they prefer the info page to document things now. The gcc(1) manpage hasn't been updated since _long_. In short, it's not only a matter of getting the latest manpage from the GCC project, it's a matter of synchronizing this manpage with the (huge) GCC info page and it's a significant job. Cheers, Maxime