From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jun 19 12:46:07 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA13381
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 12:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cypher.net (black@zen.pratt.edu [205.232.115.155])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA13367
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 12:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from black@localhost) by cypher.net (8.8.5/8.7.1) id PAA26618; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 15:46:57 -0400
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 15:46:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net>
To: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: OpenBSD
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970619111331.18142K-100000@mail.cdsnet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970619154613.15649A-100000@zen.cypher.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

the security fixes are real.  unfortunately, few people can deal with 
theo deraadt, so step lightly on the openbsd lists.

On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, Jaye Mathisen wrote:

> 
> 
> Sheesh, how many people do they have working on that thing?  I was reading
> the 2.1 release announcement, and shaking my head...
> 
> Of course, the "20 or more security fixes", w/o mentioning subsystems was 
> amusing.  (Not doubting that they were fixed, only the tossing around of
> unsubstantiated numbers).
> 
> Anybody running FreeBSD given it a shot just to see?  I  have been
> thinking about it to see if it fixes my UFS problems that are seemingly
> unrepairable.
>