From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 5 06:13:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DCD106566C for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 06:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFF58FC12 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 06:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Lf6py-0004KW-Kk for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 06:13:43 +0000 Received: from 193.33.173.33 ([193.33.173.33]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 06:13:42 +0000 Received: from c.kworr by 193.33.173.33 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 06:13:42 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Volodymyr Kostyrko Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:13:29 +0200 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <200902121232.30515.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.33.173.33 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; ru-RU; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090126 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 In-Reply-To: <200902121232.30515.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> Sender: news Subject: Re: Call for potential ports maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 06:13:47 -0000 Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > I have summarised some details on the wiki on Adopting Ports, > http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsTasks#head-f018f566bce2ff96ec13fabd536d7cc6dc6f4275. How about adding the mentioned script as periodic weekly job? Let it be disabled by default. I'm monitoring a bunch of machines and I think I'll be much happier with periodic warnings about ports which can require more then just submitting a PR. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.