From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 8 19:08:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162831065683 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:08:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kozlov@ravenloft.kiev.ua) Received: from istc.kiev.ua (wolf.istc.kiev.ua [193.108.236.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03578FC17 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:08:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kozlov@ravenloft.kiev.ua) Received: from [91.123.146.100] (helo=ravenloft.kiev.ua) by istc.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1KRXJb-000321-9J; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:07:57 +0300 Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 22:07:54 +0300 From: Alex Kozlov To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= , hackers@freebsd.org, spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua Message-ID: <20080808190754.GA6827@ravenloft.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Content analysis detailz: (1.0 points, 10.0 required) * 1.0 URI_NOVOWEL URI: URI hostname has long non-vowel sequence Cc: Subject: Re: Idea for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:08:01 -0000 On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 12:19:54PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Alex Kozlov writes: > > Matthew Seaman writes: > > > [...] XML itself is too general-purpose: it has too much baggage > > > designed for its primary function of facilitating interoperation > > > between diverse systems in different zones of control, none of which > > > is particularly applicable to system startup. > > While in general I agree with You, I must note that We already have > > xml parser (expat 1.95) for geom. See /lib/libbsdxml.so* > Non sequitur. The fact that we have an XML parser in base does not make > XML more (or less) suitable for the task. I never said anything like this. Only that argument about 'to have another shlib or two... available early in the boot process' is invalid. -- Adios