From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 19 06:51:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19B316A4CE; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 06:51:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7858343D46; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 06:51:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from tomcat.kitchenlab.org (tomcat.kitchenlab.org [64.142.31.107]) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2J6pNHM022711 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:51:23 -0800 Received: from tomcat.kitchenlab.org (localhost.kitchenlab.org [127.0.0.1]) by tomcat.kitchenlab.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2J6pMuG008644; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:51:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by tomcat.kitchenlab.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j2J6pLQA008643; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:51:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: tomcat.kitchenlab.org: bmah set sender to bmah@freebsd.org using -f From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <1111210527.41721.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20050319030449.GG4271@freebsdmall.com> <1111210527.41721.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-PKbAZ+gHyWwfXeJXkx4O" Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:51:20 -0800 Message-Id: <1111215080.97034.9.camel@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: gnome@freebsd.org cc: Murray Stokely Subject: Re: fam X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 06:51:23 -0000 --=-PKbAZ+gHyWwfXeJXkx4O Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 19:04 -0800, Murray Stokely wrote: > > How important is fam to GNOME. Should we add a commented out entry to > > inetd.conf? Any comment on PR: conf/74004? >=20 > I'll say it's critical to a user-friendly GNOME installation. Without > FAM, you will need to restart gnome-panel each time you install new > software, the GTK+ file chooser doesn't update dynamically nor does > Nautilus (or anything related to the file system). I can't imagine > actually using a GNOME installation without FAM. Heh. Well, I did for several months, up until about an hour ago. Amazing how much better Nautilus works now. :-) So where should I have looked for this information? (ports/devel/fam/pkg-message didn't do me any good...it scrolled off the screen when I originally installed GNOME from the meta-port.) Cheers, Bruce. --=-PKbAZ+gHyWwfXeJXkx4O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCO8vo2MoxcVugUsMRAso7AKDmiIMWDkmdL72WOO0KeQElp7sXNwCg6xW9 4ginlaAj3EsC0BzQtw55onc= =b6hY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-PKbAZ+gHyWwfXeJXkx4O--