Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:51:20 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: Murray Stokely <murray@freebsdmall.com> Subject: Re: fam Message-ID: <1111215080.97034.9.camel@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> In-Reply-To: <1111210527.41721.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20050319030449.GG4271@freebsdmall.com> <1111210527.41721.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-PKbAZ+gHyWwfXeJXkx4O Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 19:04 -0800, Murray Stokely wrote: > > How important is fam to GNOME. Should we add a commented out entry to > > inetd.conf? Any comment on PR: conf/74004? >=20 > I'll say it's critical to a user-friendly GNOME installation. Without > FAM, you will need to restart gnome-panel each time you install new > software, the GTK+ file chooser doesn't update dynamically nor does > Nautilus (or anything related to the file system). I can't imagine > actually using a GNOME installation without FAM. Heh. Well, I did for several months, up until about an hour ago. Amazing how much better Nautilus works now. :-) So where should I have looked for this information? (ports/devel/fam/pkg-message didn't do me any good...it scrolled off the screen when I originally installed GNOME from the meta-port.) Cheers, Bruce. --=-PKbAZ+gHyWwfXeJXkx4O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCO8vo2MoxcVugUsMRAso7AKDmiIMWDkmdL72WOO0KeQElp7sXNwCg6xW9 4ginlaAj3EsC0BzQtw55onc= =b6hY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-PKbAZ+gHyWwfXeJXkx4O--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1111215080.97034.9.camel>