From owner-freebsd-fs Wed Jul 24 6:43:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F2137B400 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 06:43:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1175443E3B for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 06:43:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA01409; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 23:43:15 +1000 Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 23:47:29 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rename hardlinks "works" on FreeBSD, but no-op on others In-Reply-To: <20020723055953.GJ77219@elvis.mu.org> Message-ID: <20020724234432.P33567-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Er, ok. Frankly since we're the only ones that do it "wrong" and > NFSv4 specifically states: > > [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3010.txt - page 153] > If oldname and newname both refer to the same file (they might be > hard links of each other), then RENAME should perform no action > and return success. > > ...is there some way I can convince you to polish up and commit your > deltas? NFSv4 is fairly convincing. I'll clean up my patch and commit something later this week. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message