From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 16 03:06:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EDA16A4CE; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 03:06:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from satie.private.org (qclgw.qcl.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.70.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BA043D1F; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 03:06:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by satie.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6G36Mb5001492; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 12:06:23 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 12:06:21 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040716.120621.846937099.chat95@mac.com> To: 4711@chello.at From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: <200407160044.26629.4711@chello.at> References: <200407160044.26629.4711@chello.at> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org cc: das@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openoffice-1.1 make target fails on CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 03:06:55 -0000 In Message-ID: <200407160044.26629.4711@chello.at> Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> wrote: Hi Christian, > It looks like Davids commit on gcc builtins, > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2004-July/072713.html , > breaks the build of the openoffice-1.1 port on CURRENT. :( > #ifdef __STDC__ > rv = HUGE_VAL; > #else > /* Can't trust HUGE_VAL */ > #ifdef IEEE_Arith > word0(rv) = Exp_mask; > word1(rv) = 0; > #else > word0(rv) = Big0; > word1(rv) = Big1; > #endif > #endif > > Is it save to comment out the the STDC define and use the IEEE_Arith define save is typo of safe? then maybe okay. however, I'm not sure whether __STDC__ should defined somewhere for FreeBSD. > instead? Or, David, is there anything you want to change on the compilers > definitions? I also would like to ask David about it. thanks --nakata maho