Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 15:20:06 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Cc: ganzer@san.rr.com, multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Meteor-II? / Multiple video capture cards? Message-ID: <199802212320.PAA13740@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 21 Feb 1998 22:09:19 %2B0100." <199802212109.WAA03583@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > As for you need something better than a bt848 , what do you mean? > > i was going to ask the same question... amancio, did you see any > noticeable difference in quality (signal/noise) between the bt848 and > the meteor ? > > cheers > luigi > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message I have both bt848 cards and a matrox meteor card laying around here. I lay my meteor to rest . The quality if you can discern it should be better on the bt848 cards. It is very difficult to tell the difference over here. One simple minded test that I have not tried in a long time is to aim a camera at a steadily lit place and use vic to measure the frame rate or net rate of the transmission. If you have a noisy image capture it will show up in the trasmission rate. The last time I measured both meteors and bt848 cards on my system they where transmitting at approximately the same rate. Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802212320.PAA13740>