From owner-freebsd-current Mon Aug 4 10:30:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA14190 for current-outgoing; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 10:30:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA14174 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 10:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA04308; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 10:28:01 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199708041728.KAA04308@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Moving to a more current BIND To: karl@Mcs.Net (Karl Denninger) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 10:28:01 -0700 (MST) Cc: Studded@dal.net, lists@tar.com, terry@lambert.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <19970803200414.01928@Jupiter.Mcs.Net> from "Karl Denninger" at Aug 3, 97 08:04:14 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > A CNAME can *only* point to an "A" record. > > Using CNAMEs in NS lines is in violation of the BIND rules and will break. > > Don't do it. If you do it, people using BIND 8.1.1 *CANNOT RESOLVE YOUR > DOMAIN*. That includes, among others, us. Funny. The above mail was sent to the list and CC'ed to me. Apparently, your "us" found my machine without problems. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.