From owner-freebsd-current Sat Nov 23 02:00:46 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA18166 for current-outgoing; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 02:00:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA18159 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 02:00:38 -0800 (PST) Received: (from msmith@localhost) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.2/8.7.3) id UAA22401; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 20:28:44 +1030 (CST) From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199611230958.UAA22401@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: cdrom boot? In-Reply-To: <199611230029.RAA16302@phaeton.artisoft.com> from Terry Lambert at "Nov 22, 96 05:29:51 pm" To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 20:28:43 +1030 (CST) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Terry Lambert stands accused of saying: > > > > protoize(1) used to be accompanied by unprotoize(1) in the gcc > > distribution for a long time. They use the gcc parser with a special > > shortcut that causes it to dump its internal structures in a C > > notation. > > Is it *currently* accompanied by unprotoize(1)? Probably. Unprotoize is required for bootstrapping gcc on platforms with non-ANSI C compilers; this should be obvious. > % man 1 unprotoize > No entry for unprotoize in section 1 of the manual FreeBSD obviously doesn't need unprotoize 8) > Terry Lambert -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[