Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 20:42:13 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: desktop@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 263307] devel/glib20 Options Default not default options poudriere builds fail arch i386 maybe others Message-ID: <bug-263307-39348-a63dd3BN2g@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-263307-39348@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-263307-39348@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D263307 --- Comment #1 from Adriaan de Groot <adridg@freebsd.org> --- I'm having a hard time mapping the options to claim to have set, to the opt= ions that end up in the package you're showing. Locally, a default build shows me this: ``` root@13amd64-area51:/usr/ports/devel/glib20 # make showconfig =3D=3D=3D> The following configuration options are available for glib-2.70.= 4_4,2: DEBUG=3Doff: Build with debugging support DOCS=3Doff: Build and/or install documentation FAM_ALTBACKEND=3Doff: Alternate file monitor backend MANPAGES=3Don: Build and/or install manual pages NLS=3Doff: Native Language Support TEST=3Doff: Build and/or run tests ``` Switching on DOCS also switches on TESTS, adding gtk-doc (for DOCS itself) = and dbus-daemon (for TEST) into the mix -- so your description of dependencies matches what DOCS + MANPAGES + TEST would require. It doesn't match just MANPAGES. With just MANPAGES defined, the output of `make configure ends with ``` glib 2.70.4 User defined options buildtype : release default_library: both infodir : share/info localstatedir : /var mandir : man prefix : /usr/local strip : True b_colorout : never b_lundef : false dtrace : false gtk_doc : false iconv : external installed_tests: false libmount : disabled man : true selinux : disabled tests : false xattr : false ``` Note in particular that gtk_doc is false, tests is false, while man is fals= e. That matches the port OPTIONS. Unless there's something special about i386 (there might be: Jan pointed me at a cluster failure), or 13.0p10 (there mi= ght be: Craig has issues on 12.3) this is an "unable to reproduce" situation. I have some fairly random 13-STABLE amd64 but all packages built through poudriere. I'll take a stab at 12.3 or such. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-263307-39348-a63dd3BN2g>