From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sat Feb 3 15:45:40 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456E5ED3DBA; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 15:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobutaka@nobutaka.org) Received: from ik1-329-24577.vs.sakura.ne.jp (ik1-329-24577.vs.sakura.ne.jp [153.126.186.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C207E6ED61; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 15:45:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobutaka@nobutaka.org) Received: from vm-home2.internal.nobutaka.org (i207098.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [61.125.207.98]) by ik1-329-24577.vs.sakura.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 239B7C6D944; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 00:45:38 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 00:45:36 +0900 Message-ID: <86wozut6u7.wl-nobutaka@FreeBSD.org> From: Nobutaka Mantani To: Cy Schubert Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev , Mark Linimon , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r460814 - head/www/w3m In-Reply-To: <201802031525.w13FPkPG004608@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <20180203144001.GB10426@FreeBSD.org> <201802031525.w13FPkPG004608@slippy.cwsent.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-2022-JP-2?B?R29qGyQoRCtXGyhC?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (amd64-portbld-freebsd11.1) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 15:45:40 -0000 On Sun, 04 Feb 2018 00:25:46 +0900, Cy Schubert wrote: > > In message <20180203144001.GB10426@FreeBSD.org>, Alexey Dokuchaev > writes: > > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 08:33:28AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 02:12:57PM +0000, MANTANI Nobutaka wrote: > > > > Remove PORTREVISION that should be removed in the previous update. > > > > > > Well, once it is in, it must stay in, if I understand things correctly. > > > > It was fixed pretty fast, so it's probably OK (typically I'd agree, hence > > I've said "FYI"). > > I've been in that situation, when an upline vendor sends patches, > forgets to remove PORTREVSION and I don't catch it. It sucks but it is > what it is. > > Due to timing of mirror updates and people running svnup someone may > have a port with PORTREVISION and when PORTREVISION is bumped to 1 > again said persons will not receive an update. It's not OK. Either > revert the change or increase PORTEPOCH. Thank you for your advice. I'll revert the previous commit. -- Nobutaka Mantani nobutaka@FreeBSD.org, nobutaka@nobutaka.org