From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 17 21:01:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CC2A5E; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:01:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeus@ibs.dn.ua) Received: from relay.ibs.dn.ua (relay.ibs.dn.ua [91.216.196.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C95022BC2; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:01:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ibs.dn.ua (relay.ibs.dn.ua [91.216.196.25]) by relay.ibs.dn.ua with ESMTP id r7HL1ORk032167; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 00:01:26 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <20130818000124.32165@relay.ibs.dn.ua> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 00:01:24 -2100 From: "Zeus Panchenko" To: "Martin Matuska" Subject: Re: what is the "correct" way to "replicate" mem stick with ZFS on it? In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 17 Aug 2013 22:00:09 +0200 <520FD649.10901@FreeBSD.org> References: <20130816162532.72259@relay.ibs.dn.ua> <520FD524.5070004@FreeBSD.org> <520FD649.10901@FreeBSD.org> Organization: I.B.S. LLC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed; reply-type=original X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3.1; GNU Mailutils 2.99.98; GNU Emacs 24.0.93 X-Face: &sReWXo3Iwtqql1[My(t1Gkx; y?KF@KF`4X+'9Cs@PtK^y%}^.>Mtbpyz6U=,Op:KPOT.uG )Nvx`=er!l?WASh7KeaGhga"1[&yz$_7ir'cVp7o%CGbJ/V)j/=]vzvvcqcZkf; JDurQG6wTg+?/xA go`}1.Ze//K; Fk&/&OoHd'[b7iGt2UO>o(YskCT[_D)kh4!yY'<&:yt+zM=A`@`~9U+P[qS:f; #9z~ Or/Bo#N-'S'!'[3Wog'ADkyMqmGDvga?WW)qd=?)`Y&k=o}>!ST\ Cc: FreeBSD Filesystems X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Zeus Panchenko List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:01:36 -0000 thank you Martin, very much just want to be sure I understan it right Martin Matuska wrote: > > ... > > then use the "zpool split" subcommand. If you do it this way, the new > > pool will require a different name, so you have to rename it by > > reimporting it under the original name (after exporting the original pool). is it one time operation or I will need to do it each time I import flash B (the resilvered and splitted one) the cause of all that is just to "clone" flash drive to have just a copy of it, so, probably dd could be enough but it is too slow ... so, mirror/split is very nice way, I like it -- Zeus V. Panchenko jid:zeus@im.ibs.dn.ua IT Dpt., I.B.S. LLC GMT+2 (EET)