From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 20:17:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9540316A4BF for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:17:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A3143FBF for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:17:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsduser@comcast.net) Received: from comcast.net (12-225-141-88.client.attbi.com[12.225.141.88](untrusted sender)) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <20030826031707013006oe01e> (Authid: animotions); Tue, 26 Aug 2003 03:17:16 +0000 Message-ID: <3F4AD0BA.7050201@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:15:06 -0700 From: K Anderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Technical Director References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: IPFW & ICMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 03:17:18 -0000 Technical Director wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Technical Director wrote: > > >>Hello, > > >>ipfw -a l [INSERT_YOUR_FW_RULE_FOR_ICMP_BLOCKING] > > > INSERT_YOUR_FW_RULE_FOR_ICMP_BLOCK is the rule ID Number. #### below is it > as well... :) > > >>##### 0 2300 deny icmp from any to me via ed0 > > > Just to clarify. > > R. > > Thanks for the response. Yep, that's the rule and it does have counters. In your previous e-mail you were asking about the order of packet processing and that's what I'm trying to figure out as well. I figure that the firewall should block the traffic first so as to prevent ruled traffic from coming in and then, in my thinking, snort shouldn't see it. Hopefully somebody might have an explanation with the why's and how comes one way or the other.