From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 25 14:12:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D545D16A4B3; Sat, 25 Oct 2003 14:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gauss.stokely.org (builder.freebsdmall.com [65.86.180.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E5F43F93; Sat, 25 Oct 2003 14:12:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray@gauss.stokely.org) Received: from gauss.stokely.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gauss.stokely.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9PLChYm018299; Sat, 25 Oct 2003 14:12:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray@gauss.stokely.org) Received: (from murray@localhost) by gauss.stokely.org (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h9PLChnh018298; Sat, 25 Oct 2003 14:12:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 14:12:43 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: Soren Schmidt Message-ID: <20031025211243.GA18258@freebsdmall.com> References: <200310252018.h9PKIAvK037133@spider.deepcore.dk> <200310252028.h9PKSIji037371@spider.deepcore.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200310252028.h9PKSIji037371@spider.deepcore.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible mouse/ATA problems in -STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 21:12:45 -0000 On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 10:28:18PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: > Oh, maybe I should say that the ATA driver in -current is *very* > different from the one in stable. This makes the idea of MFC's > moot since very little code can be moved without a rewrite. This > mandates significant testing etc since is will be like new virgin code. Then it would be nice to at least just have an errata item for this issue. Possible workarounds? - Murray