From owner-freebsd-current Mon Sep 28 10:18:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA15954 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 28 Sep 1998 10:18:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA15946 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 1998 10:18:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA15150; Mon, 28 Sep 1998 10:17:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: "John W. DeBoskey" cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cannot creeat boot.std floppy In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 28 Sep 1998 10:57:08 EDT." <199809281457.KAA01886@bb01f39.unx.sas.com> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 10:17:37 -0700 Message-ID: <15146.907003057@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I am unable to create the boot floppy due to a lack of > space. The last I saw come across concerning this was the > removal of tape install support by jkh. Correction: I didn't remove all tape install support, simply floppy tape install support. > I modified doFS.sh to get some blocksize info before > the failure which follows below. If we are not going to > currently support tape devices, should we not also remove > it from the BOOTMFS config file? ie: > > device sa0 > tape ft0 at fdc0 drive 2 Good point - done. > and do we really need the following in a boot kernel? Yes, it seems we do. > and do we need vx0 with Bill Paul's (I think thats the name) work? Yes. It covers a different set of cards than xl0. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message