From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Aug 28 2:50:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C519837B443 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 02:50:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id CAA53005; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 02:50:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 02:50:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200008280950.CAA53005@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: kern/20877: ICMP error msg on UDP port unreachable is incorrect Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/20877; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: volf@oasis.iaehv.nl (Frank Volf) Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/20877: ICMP error msg on UDP port unreachable is incorrect Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 11:42:39 +0200 On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 19:45:22 +0200, Frank Volf wrote: > I disagree with the fact that you simply close this pr as being a duplicate > case of PR 16240. > > PR 16240 tries to address the generic problem, which is indeed present in > many network implementations and may or maynot be difficult to fix. Do you not agree that the resolution to PR 16240 will resolve PR 20877 as a side-effect? I know that we're not altogether keen on applying hack-arounds for more general problems unless the more general problems can't be resolved in the foreseeable future. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message